Escape from tarkov console Pc#

Skill vs skill, on an even playing field, would be closer to my definition of hardcore. What percentage will have more frames? Because you're stating it as though 100% will, when that's extremely unlikely to be true.ДЄnd again, I don't see how hardware advantages translate to 'hardcore' unless your definition of hardcore is just how much money you spend. In your third paragraph you're stating assumptions as fact.

Escape from tarkov console Pc#

Your first paragraph talks about your own personal configuration and that of some friends, which does not address the ~9x% of PC gamers who do not have a setup like yours. deflating the false, inflated aura of 'PC'. I'm also clearly not attempting to inflate console quality, seeing as I didn't mention any consoles or console in general in my statement. You say my 'argument' is irrelevant, yet my statement, was just a reminder that 'PC' isn't a product that exists and talking like a high spec PC equals 'PC' as a singular object and that anyone with any PC configuration will achieve better results is far from the truth. It's just an uneven playing field and somewhat pay to win. If you're talking single player, I'm with you, obviously better is better, but multiplayer-wise 4k144 ultra vs 720p60 low (as an example) wouldn't fit my definition of hardcore. Advantages over other players? I prefer an even playing field, not everyone on different resolutions, frame rates, graphics, effects, input devices, etc. InactiveUser 2138d ago (Edited 2138d ago )Дefine 'hardcore'. In fact, that's exactly the purpose of consoles, to cater to the casual crowd that just wants to press power, and pick up a controller. Not all of us have deep enough pockets, or care about improved input response, no screen tearing, or 144 frames per second. It's okay to not be hardcore enough to game at more than 900, sometimes 1080. Even the minimum spec systems, will typically vastly outperform the archaic tech of the consoles. Haha.Д®ven with PC gamers who only game at 1080, will not only have way more frames, they will have native 1080, with tons of graphical options that don't appear on consoles.

The fact that you feel the need to expand upon their definition of 'looking better' to try to inflate the quality that will be seen on consoles, by saying that most PC users won't have it looking better than the console crowd, is a MASSIVE stretch.

Most of my friends haven't even been given the survey. It shows your statistics compared to other users. The last steam survey I did, I had three 1440 screens, and a 65' 4K connected at once. That's the beauty of PC gpus, we have options that console gamers can't even imagine. It doesn't take that much effort to allow your game to properly scale to the resolution of our choice.

PC game developers tend to cater to the highest possible configuration, then make all of the settings scalable down from there.